Chinese Journal of Rice Science ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 211-217.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.02.011

• Research Papers • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Application Volume and Approaches of Pesticide   on Controlling Major Pests  and Diseases   on  Different  Plant Type Rice at Late Growth Stage

HUANG Shiwen 1,2, LIU Lianmeng1, WANG Ling1, LIU Enyong 1,2 , FAN Zenglan 1,2,  XIAO  Danfeng1 , HOU  Enqing 1,2   

  1. 1 China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China; Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • Received:2011-04-27 Revised:2011-09-24 Online:2012-03-10 Published:2012-03-10

药液量及施药方法对不同株型水稻生育后期主要病虫害防效的影响

黄世文1,2,刘连盟1,王玲1 ,刘恩勇1,2,范锃岚1,2,肖丹凤1 ,侯恩庆1,2   

  1. 1中国水稻研究所, 浙江 杭州 310006; 2广西大学,  广西 南宁 541004
  • 基金资助:

    国家公益性农业行业专项(nyhyzx316); 浙江省三农五方科技协助项目(SN200711); 农业科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAD08A04); 中央级公益性科研院所专项资金资助项目(2011RG009)。

Abstract: The control efficiency as affected by pesticide volumes (PV) , spraying approaches (fine spray, coarse spray) to the major pests and diseases  on rice plants at late growing stage were evaluated. For the rice neck blast, rice spikelet rot disease and leaf folder occurred at upper parts of rice plants, the best control efficiencies were obtained by two times of fine sprays(TFS), and the worst by two times of coarse sprays(TCS)  at the same pesticide application level and PV for a given rice variety. The control efficiencies by  the first fine spray and then coarse spray (FFSCS)  or the  first coarse spray and then fine spray(FCSFS) showed no significant difference. The control efficiency to japonica Xiushui 09 was better than that of  the indica/japonica hybrid combination Yongyou 12. For a rice variety at the same pesticide application level, the best control efficiency was obtained  at  PVs of 675 or 750 L/hm2, followed by 900, 1200, 450 L/hm2 and 225 L/hm2. For a variety at a given PVs, the best control efficiencies to sheath blight and planthoppers occurred on the middle and lower parts of rice plants, were gained by TCS, followed by FCSFS, FFSCS, and TFS. Control efficiency for  Xiushui 09 was better than that for Yongyou 12 at a given PV and by the same approach. For a variety by the same spraying means, the best control efficiency was obtained at the PV of 900 L/hm2, followed by 1200 and 750 L/hm2. The less water and the worse control efficiency   when the   PV was less than 900 L/hm2. The control efficiencies  to sheath blight and planthoppers were less than 50%   at the PV of 225 L/hm2. and  by TFS, especially for Yongyou 12. At the same pesticide application level, the control efficiency didn’t increase with the rising PV.

Key words: plant type, rice pests and diseases, spraying approach, pesticide application volume, control efficiency

摘要: 设计不同药液量、喷雾方法(细雾、粗雾)防治水稻后期发生的重要病虫害。结果表明,在药剂有效成分用量相同时,对于发生在稻株上部的穗颈瘟、穗腐病和稻纵卷叶螟,同一品种和相同药液量下,细雾喷雾防效最好,粗雾喷雾防效最差;第1次喷细雾第2次喷粗雾,或第1次喷粗雾第2次细雾防效相当。同一品种相同喷雾方法,以用药量675 L/hm2或750 L/hm2防效最好,其次是900 L/hm2、1200 L/hm2和450 L/hm2,最差的是225 L/hm2。对于发生在稻株中下部的纹枯病和稻飞虱,同一品种相同药液量时,2次粗雾喷雾防效最好,其次是第1次喷细雾第2次喷粗雾,再次是第1次喷粗雾第2次喷细雾,2次细雾喷雾防效最差。无论是发生在上部的病虫害,还是发生在中下部的病虫害,药液量和喷雾方法相同,对秀水09的防效均好于对甬优12。同一品种相同喷雾方法,以900 L/hm2药液量防效最好,其次是1200 L/hm2和750 L/hm2,药液量少于900 L/hm2时,防效随药液量减少而下降。225 L/hm2药液量且采用细雾喷雾,对纹枯病和稻飞虱的防效均低于50%,特别是对甬优12的防效更差。但在有效成分相同的情况下,并非药液量越多防效就越好。

关键词: 株型, 病虫害, 施药方法, 药液量, 防效, 水稻

CLC Number: